Presuppositional Apologetics | The Transcendental Argument for God
Episode 2.108
In this episode, Michael and Zach conclude their two-part series on presuppositional apologetics by examining one of its boldest claims: that without God, nothing can ultimately be proven at all. Focusing on the Transcendental Argument for God (TAG), the discussion explores the presuppositionalist claim that logic, science, morality, and knowledge itself all depend upon the Christian worldview in order to make sense.
The conversation walks through the major pillars of TAG, including the laws of logic, the uniformity of nature, and the existence of objective moral standards. Michael and Zach explain how presuppositional apologists like Greg Bahnsen and Cornelius Van Til argue that unbelieving worldviews “borrow capital” from Christianity while failing to provide a foundation for reason, science, or ethics. Along the way, the episode explores the method of internal critique, worldview analysis, and the famous Bahnsen–Stein debate that helped popularize TAG in modern apologetics.
At the same time, Michael and Zach also examine major critiques of the transcendental approach, especially from thinkers like R. C. Sproul. The episode discusses concerns about circular reasoning, the role of natural theology, the use of evidence, and whether presuppositionalism sometimes overstates its rejection of “neutral ground.” Regardless of which side of the debate one ultimately finds more persuasive, this episode aims to introduce listeners to the TAG argument, explain why many Christians find it compelling, and critically evaluate the philosophical assumptions underlying the presuppositional approach.
Find our videocast here: https://youtu.be/wrmu-jQjY4A
Merch here: https://take-2-podcast.printify.me/
Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!):
https://uppbeat.io/t/reakt-music/deep-stone
License code: 2QZOZ2YHZ5UTE7C8
Find more Take 2 Theology content at http://www.take2theology.com
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:01,880
Tag.
You're it.
2
00:00:02,120 --> 00:00:06,280
Hey, that's that's the if you're
just trying to be cool in
3
00:00:06,280 --> 00:00:10,360
apologetic circles, just just
say tag transcendental argument
4
00:00:12,040 --> 00:00:14,720
for God, I guess.
Yes, transcendental argument for
5
00:00:14,720 --> 00:00:18,200
God.
I didn't even know that they had
6
00:00:18,200 --> 00:00:21,440
that and I was asking some
questions back and forth with
7
00:00:21,440 --> 00:00:25,200
chat and it I said
transcendental argument and then
8
00:00:25,200 --> 00:00:27,400
it came back with tag and I was
like is this a common?
9
00:00:27,520 --> 00:00:29,880
Thing like the lingo, all the
kids are all the new
10
00:00:29,880 --> 00:00:32,640
apologetics.
Cool kids are just, you know,
11
00:00:33,280 --> 00:00:37,680
tag and we've covered this in,
you know, a previous episode,
12
00:00:37,680 --> 00:00:41,560
but this will be good through
maybe closer to precept and you
13
00:00:41,560 --> 00:00:44,040
can give your insight like, hey,
this is like exactly the same.
14
00:00:44,040 --> 00:00:47,520
It's different, you know, the
the nuances, maybe it's the
15
00:00:47,520 --> 00:00:50,600
exact same.
We'll we'll kind of get into it
16
00:00:50,600 --> 00:00:52,680
today and then at the end of the
episode, I think this might be
17
00:00:52,680 --> 00:00:55,640
helpful.
Talk about the Sproul Bonson
18
00:00:55,640 --> 00:00:58,400
debate, specifically the
concerns in the beginning of
19
00:00:58,400 --> 00:01:00,480
this debate.
Sproul was like, love you
20
00:01:00,480 --> 00:01:02,360
Bonson.
Here's 7 or 9.
21
00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:04,160
There's a bunch here.
I got a list of concerns.
22
00:01:04,160 --> 00:01:07,320
This is what concerns me about
precept and went through them.
23
00:01:07,320 --> 00:01:10,360
Some were big, some were small,
but I think they're helpful as
24
00:01:10,360 --> 00:01:11,640
we and we've kind of discussed
some of these.
25
00:01:12,760 --> 00:01:18,480
I have a list of concerns too
that I compiled me and I was
26
00:01:18,480 --> 00:01:21,040
like, here are my concerns.
I was I was asking chat what are
27
00:01:21,040 --> 00:01:22,440
some other concerns that people
listen?
28
00:01:22,440 --> 00:01:23,920
So I wonder how much that
they'll.
29
00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:24,880
Overlap maybe?
Yeah.
30
00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:27,200
How much you speak like Sperle?
I love it.
31
00:01:27,240 --> 00:01:29,760
Well, let's go ahead and take it
to the next level.
32
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:39,040
Let's fire up that twanga music.
From the hearts of the Low
33
00:01:39,040 --> 00:01:44,360
Country in South Carolina.
It's the Take Two podcast, but
34
00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:46,560
we take theology to the next
level.
35
00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:50,880
If God does not exist, you
cannot prove anything at all.
36
00:01:51,320 --> 00:01:53,000
That's not like a preceptor.
It does.
37
00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:55,640
I gotta be like on the street
preaching and like yelling.
38
00:01:56,600 --> 00:01:58,480
I think that that is basically
true.
39
00:01:58,480 --> 00:02:03,400
You I I think that there are
other systems potentially like
40
00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:09,600
Platonism might be able to make
a claim that we can ground
41
00:02:09,600 --> 00:02:12,440
logic.
I don't know that their system.
42
00:02:12,520 --> 00:02:14,360
I think their system fails for
other reasons.
43
00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:19,040
But in that specific area.
It doesn't make sense to me that
44
00:02:19,040 --> 00:02:21,800
there's the form of a, a
triangle out there and it's the
45
00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:25,080
most trianglest triangle that
there ever is 'cause there's
46
00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:28,920
also on this idea there's a form
of an air fryer out there and
47
00:02:28,920 --> 00:02:31,080
it's the most air fryer that an
air fryer can be.
48
00:02:31,080 --> 00:02:34,280
It is the very, it has the most
air fryerness that's there.
49
00:02:34,800 --> 00:02:39,480
It's like everything that exists
it it is basically bringing down
50
00:02:39,480 --> 00:02:43,320
a form.
So I only reason I say that is
51
00:02:43,520 --> 00:02:49,160
even though I don't believe
Platonism, I think you might be
52
00:02:49,160 --> 00:02:51,760
overstating your case if you're
saying that that that
53
00:02:51,760 --> 00:02:55,600
Christianity is the only system
that could ground logic.
54
00:02:57,000 --> 00:03:00,080
Islam can probably ground logic.
OK, yeah, you know what I'm
55
00:03:00,080 --> 00:03:03,040
saying?
Like an authority and you know a
56
00:03:03,040 --> 00:03:06,680
preceptor might say not only I
mean in the vein of you can't
57
00:03:06,680 --> 00:03:08,440
prove anything at all.
You can't prove science, you
58
00:03:08,440 --> 00:03:12,480
can't prove logic, not morality.
You can't even say the statement
59
00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:17,400
God doesn't exist and that you
know they would ground this is
60
00:03:17,400 --> 00:03:22,240
this is what the Bible this
biblical worldview, this this is
61
00:03:22,240 --> 00:03:25,520
the reality based on this
transcendental arguments.
62
00:03:25,880 --> 00:03:27,400
I'll.
Try not to say too much.
63
00:03:27,840 --> 00:03:28,920
Oh, it's good.
But Chiman.
64
00:03:28,920 --> 00:03:32,520
Yeah, Chiman it.
Seems like maybe you know 'cause
65
00:03:32,520 --> 00:03:37,280
this is we're arguing for in and
you might put this argument into
66
00:03:37,280 --> 00:03:41,720
a syllogism.
Like if God does not exist, then
67
00:03:41,720 --> 00:03:45,960
logic does not exist.
Logic does does exist, therefore
68
00:03:45,960 --> 00:03:52,600
God exists.
I don't know why the ID method
69
00:03:52,800 --> 00:03:55,680
per Paul Frank gives you a
probable God.
70
00:03:55,920 --> 00:03:58,560
And and I, I wanna say, is it
we, we should get I need to look
71
00:03:58,560 --> 00:04:00,000
this up.
Is it Paul Taylor?
72
00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:01,520
Oh, am I saying Frank the whole
time?
73
00:04:01,720 --> 00:04:03,240
Yeah, we, we, we've got back and
forth a.
74
00:04:03,280 --> 00:04:04,720
Little bit Sorry, it's Paul.
Frank Taylor.
75
00:04:04,720 --> 00:04:05,680
Paul.
Frank, there's go.
76
00:04:05,680 --> 00:04:07,160
So we're we're all right.
That's right.
77
00:04:07,320 --> 00:04:09,600
Oh man, I I now you should have
corrected me earlier in the
78
00:04:09,600 --> 00:04:11,080
last.
One I know, I just thought about
79
00:04:11,080 --> 00:04:12,280
it.
Now, Yeah, yeah, yeah.
80
00:04:12,280 --> 00:04:13,760
Paul Taylor.
Paul Taylor.
81
00:04:13,760 --> 00:04:17,959
So I need to put like a little
flash on our previous episode.
82
00:04:18,200 --> 00:04:20,200
Paul Taylor.
Yeah, Paul Taylor.
83
00:04:20,480 --> 00:04:23,080
That's good.
But Paul Taylor would say that
84
00:04:23,960 --> 00:04:27,400
that these other, well, he he
specifically said this.
85
00:04:27,400 --> 00:04:28,960
Sorry, I know I'm already
derailing.
86
00:04:28,960 --> 00:04:32,680
It hey, he wrote this guy wrote
a a thesis state a a a whole
87
00:04:32,680 --> 00:04:35,000
research paper on this book.
And that was only halfway done.
88
00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:36,400
I've added more to it since
then.
89
00:04:36,840 --> 00:04:39,640
It's going on Goodreads, so
you'll you I'll, I'll eventually
90
00:04:39,640 --> 00:04:44,480
share it with you.
But he says he makes a statement
91
00:04:44,800 --> 00:04:49,640
that the Kalam cosmological
argument only proves the God of
92
00:04:49,640 --> 00:04:52,520
the philosophers, not the God of
the Bible.
93
00:04:52,960 --> 00:04:55,640
He does not have the attributes
of the God of the Bible and
94
00:04:55,640 --> 00:04:57,440
therefore it is an idolatrous
God.
95
00:04:57,800 --> 00:05:01,800
And the Kalam cosmological
argument is sinful to give that
96
00:05:01,800 --> 00:05:05,440
argument.
How is that different than this
97
00:05:05,440 --> 00:05:07,680
argument, the transcendental
argument?
98
00:05:07,960 --> 00:05:09,680
You're not going to find that
this God.
99
00:05:09,680 --> 00:05:13,240
Is a you necessarily have to.
Have all the attributes of the
100
00:05:13,240 --> 00:05:16,880
God of the Bible.
So it's just, it's just crazy to
101
00:05:16,880 --> 00:05:18,800
me.
I think you could take this
102
00:05:18,800 --> 00:05:22,120
argument and you could say, you
know the Old Testament.
103
00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:25,520
You don't get all of the
attributes of God in the Old
104
00:05:25,520 --> 00:05:29,320
Testament and therefore the Old
Testament proves a blast.
105
00:05:29,320 --> 00:05:33,840
It's blasphemous 'cause it
proves a it's like no one, no
106
00:05:33,840 --> 00:05:37,440
one really thinks that way.
I have a moth land on me, but no
107
00:05:37,440 --> 00:05:40,880
one, no one thinks that way.
So and so this is will cut
108
00:05:40,880 --> 00:05:43,440
against the the tag argument as
well.
109
00:05:43,760 --> 00:05:44,720
But there you.
I like that.
110
00:05:44,720 --> 00:05:47,640
Well, with that being said,
let's jump into it and let's
111
00:05:47,640 --> 00:05:50,320
take it to the next level.
Bam bam bam bam.
112
00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:52,520
Did we already take it the next?
We already took it to the next
113
00:05:52,520 --> 00:05:54,880
level.
Well, let's, let's, let's take
114
00:05:54,880 --> 00:05:58,960
it to even higher level.
I'm just blindly, you know,
115
00:05:59,200 --> 00:06:02,040
running along here.
'Cause I wrote that in there to
116
00:06:02,040 --> 00:06:03,640
remind us to take it to the
next.
117
00:06:03,720 --> 00:06:04,880
Level.
I guess it's better to do it
118
00:06:04,880 --> 00:06:08,160
twice than not at all.
Let's jump.
119
00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:09,920
Do you want to run through the
description passages or do you
120
00:06:09,920 --> 00:06:13,600
want to jump to what is tag?
Maybe we should talk about what
121
00:06:13,600 --> 00:06:15,760
is tag and then it's great come
back.
122
00:06:15,760 --> 00:06:17,400
You want to do that?
Let's do.
123
00:06:17,400 --> 00:06:19,480
That 'cause you've already kind
of set that up a little bit.
124
00:06:19,920 --> 00:06:22,440
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
So transcendental argument, I
125
00:06:22,440 --> 00:06:25,640
think we talked about it.
Most of the time it's given in
126
00:06:25,960 --> 00:06:27,600
a.
Let's see if I can remember this
127
00:06:27,600 --> 00:06:29,480
modus tollens or.
Modus ponens.
128
00:06:29,480 --> 00:06:30,760
Oh, I remember us talking about
it now.
129
00:06:30,880 --> 00:06:33,280
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So I I can't remember which
130
00:06:33,280 --> 00:06:37,960
one's which I should, but one of
them, the classical argument is
131
00:06:38,200 --> 00:06:43,160
P, then QPQ.
Nice.
132
00:06:43,160 --> 00:06:46,520
I think that's modus ponens.
I think that's right.
133
00:06:47,280 --> 00:06:48,920
You should you should tell me
Modus.
134
00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:54,760
We'll just go with that.
The opposite is not Q, not P.
135
00:06:54,840 --> 00:06:57,760
Pardon me?
Yeah, let's see.
136
00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:04,360
Yeah.
If not Q, then not PPQ.
137
00:07:04,920 --> 00:07:08,880
OK, So what we're saying is, and
that's most of the time we give
138
00:07:08,880 --> 00:07:11,640
it in that phrase.
So like the the the moral
139
00:07:11,640 --> 00:07:18,400
argument will say that if God
does not exist, then objective
140
00:07:18,720 --> 00:07:22,760
moral duties and obligations do
not exist.
141
00:07:22,920 --> 00:07:26,200
OK, yeah, I gotcha.
But objective moral duties and
142
00:07:26,200 --> 00:07:27,680
obligations do exist.
That's right.
143
00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:29,160
Therefore I.
See.
144
00:07:29,240 --> 00:07:34,000
That's good.
And that's the same form for the
145
00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:39,400
tag.
If you know knowledge logic, you
146
00:07:39,400 --> 00:07:41,760
could put that in there.
You know if God does not exist,
147
00:07:41,760 --> 00:07:45,040
logic does not exist.
Logic exists, therefore God
148
00:07:45,040 --> 00:07:46,880
exists.
OK, gotcha.
149
00:07:46,880 --> 00:07:51,840
That is essentially the
transmental argument that God is
150
00:07:51,840 --> 00:07:54,960
the necessary foundation that
makes reasonable reasoning
151
00:07:54,960 --> 00:07:58,120
possible in the 1st place.
We talked about Cornelius van
152
00:07:58,120 --> 00:07:59,960
'til.
I love people that have three
153
00:07:59,960 --> 00:08:01,760
names like, you know, they're
important.
154
00:08:02,120 --> 00:08:07,920
Greg Bonson talks about a lot, a
lot really, that that's the
155
00:08:07,920 --> 00:08:11,280
foundation, the precondition for
logic, science, morality,
156
00:08:11,560 --> 00:08:13,960
knowledge.
We talked about this last week.
157
00:08:13,960 --> 00:08:17,640
It's not saying here's evidence,
therefore God exists.
158
00:08:17,640 --> 00:08:20,840
This is trying to argue without
God you wouldn't even have
159
00:08:20,840 --> 00:08:24,400
evidence, logic or reasoning in
the first place.
160
00:08:26,640 --> 00:08:29,240
The internal critique method.
Now keep going right?
161
00:08:30,040 --> 00:08:33,240
Yeah, so a pre supper might say
that.
162
00:08:33,760 --> 00:08:36,840
They might say, I haven't given
you evidence that God exists,
163
00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:39,360
but you have.
You're calling him out, you're
164
00:08:39,640 --> 00:08:41,120
saying?
You're, you're saying, hey,
165
00:08:41,120 --> 00:08:44,680
look, just like I was saying in
the last episode, like they're
166
00:08:44,680 --> 00:08:47,880
pointing out like, hey, look at
this, this thing right here,
167
00:08:48,400 --> 00:08:51,920
it's declaring the glory of God
is telling us more about God.
168
00:08:52,120 --> 00:08:53,720
This is evidence that God
exists.
169
00:08:54,000 --> 00:08:57,560
Look, here's logic.
It's and, and I, I have no
170
00:08:57,560 --> 00:08:59,800
problem with that.
Just don't get on to me from
171
00:08:59,800 --> 00:09:01,800
saying here's the beginning of
the universe.
172
00:09:01,800 --> 00:09:03,680
It had to have something that
caused it.
173
00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:06,960
Here's fine tuning in the
universe, here's morality.
174
00:09:07,240 --> 00:09:10,960
You know, those type of things.
Let's talk the internal critique
175
00:09:10,960 --> 00:09:13,680
method.
So they probably wouldn't say
176
00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:15,920
today I'm going to prove
Christianity to you.
177
00:09:15,920 --> 00:09:20,000
They're actually going to ask
you can your worldview actually
178
00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:24,840
explain reality anyway?
And, and, and really the goal is
179
00:09:24,840 --> 00:09:28,040
what we talked about a lot is
just try trying to show where it
180
00:09:28,040 --> 00:09:29,880
collapses, where it's
inconsistent.
181
00:09:30,440 --> 00:09:33,040
Show them their worldview.
It is bad.
182
00:09:33,040 --> 00:09:34,520
What?
And then what they would say is
183
00:09:34,520 --> 00:09:36,080
we're not going to adopt this
worldview.
184
00:09:36,560 --> 00:09:39,760
We're going to expose it
essentially.
185
00:09:40,360 --> 00:09:44,360
So for example, an atheist might
say only science gives truth.
186
00:09:44,880 --> 00:09:47,360
They might say, is that
statement scientifically proven
187
00:09:47,640 --> 00:09:49,880
or is that a philosophical
assumption?
188
00:09:49,880 --> 00:09:52,280
And and so they're, they're just
trying to ask these questions to
189
00:09:52,280 --> 00:09:57,720
reveal inconsistency.
Next, if you listen to any of
190
00:09:57,720 --> 00:09:59,840
these debates, we love to talk
laws of logic.
191
00:09:59,840 --> 00:10:00,760
Are you gonna jump in with
something?
192
00:10:00,760 --> 00:10:01,960
Different.
I was just trying to find out
193
00:10:01,960 --> 00:10:04,040
where you were in the notes so I
could follow along with you.
194
00:10:04,040 --> 00:10:04,560
Where?
Where?
195
00:10:04,800 --> 00:10:08,400
I'm in Section 3, the three
pillars of tag.
196
00:10:08,400 --> 00:10:09,440
OK, gotcha.
Gotcha, gotcha.
197
00:10:09,520 --> 00:10:11,320
Sorry.
The laws of logic so and this
198
00:10:11,320 --> 00:10:13,200
comes up in the bots and debate.
They talk about them being
199
00:10:13,200 --> 00:10:18,280
universal, unchanging and
abstract or not, not physical.
200
00:10:18,880 --> 00:10:22,640
And and this is like the exact
thing Botson goes to the law of
201
00:10:22,640 --> 00:10:26,680
non contradiction.
You know, a is not equal to non
202
00:10:26,680 --> 00:10:30,880
A essentially, is this a prompt
for atheism?
203
00:10:31,080 --> 00:10:33,240
They would say, yes.
You know, if reality is only
204
00:10:33,240 --> 00:10:36,680
matter, if it's only particles
in motion, then how do we
205
00:10:36,680 --> 00:10:40,360
account for these immaterial,
universal, abstract, unchanging
206
00:10:40,360 --> 00:10:41,800
laws?
Where where do these things come
207
00:10:41,800 --> 00:10:44,000
from?
And so they'll ask questions
208
00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:46,200
like, you know, are is logic
physical?
209
00:10:46,480 --> 00:10:48,640
Is it cultural?
Is a personal preference.
210
00:10:48,640 --> 00:10:50,760
Where do you run into trouble?
Listen, listen.
211
00:10:51,480 --> 00:10:53,760
I've listened to some of these
debates and if they don't like,
212
00:10:53,760 --> 00:10:56,360
if you can't, if you can't agree
on this, then it is real.
213
00:10:56,360 --> 00:10:58,040
It's really you're not going
anywhere.
214
00:10:58,360 --> 00:11:02,400
Yeah, If I were an atheist, I
might say something like this to
215
00:11:02,520 --> 00:11:05,000
to counter the.
If I if I was like put in the
216
00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:06,960
atheist seat, I might say
something like.
217
00:11:06,960 --> 00:11:14,000
The fact that there is being
that something exists indicates
218
00:11:14,080 --> 00:11:18,480
that we have to have something
like the.
219
00:11:18,960 --> 00:11:22,240
So the three laws of logic are
the law of identity.
220
00:11:22,400 --> 00:11:26,120
I can say what something is and
it is that like a is.
221
00:11:26,520 --> 00:11:27,920
A Yep, makes sense.
The law.
222
00:11:27,920 --> 00:11:31,960
Of non contradiction, a is not
not A and the law of excluded
223
00:11:31,960 --> 00:11:36,480
middle, like for a well defined
property, either you're a or not
224
00:11:36,480 --> 00:11:37,400
a.
You're not something in the
225
00:11:37,400 --> 00:11:38,200
middle.
That's right.
226
00:11:38,320 --> 00:11:39,480
There's no Yeah, that's right.
Yeah.
227
00:11:39,480 --> 00:11:41,840
So those are the three laws of
logic and those kind of come
228
00:11:41,840 --> 00:11:46,680
into the fact if anything
exists, you have to have that
229
00:11:46,680 --> 00:11:49,320
because you can't have both
existence and not like you can't
230
00:11:49,320 --> 00:11:54,040
say, you know, Aristotle is
famous for designing truth, for
231
00:11:54,040 --> 00:11:58,640
defining truth as to say of what
is that it is to say of what is
232
00:11:58,640 --> 00:12:02,120
not that is not that is true.
To say of what is that it is not
233
00:12:02,120 --> 00:12:04,640
or to say of what is not that it
is that is false.
234
00:12:05,440 --> 00:12:10,600
You know, just a basic
definition that true means that
235
00:12:10,600 --> 00:12:13,960
something reflects reality.
OK, that makes sense.
236
00:12:14,360 --> 00:12:16,920
So an atheist might come back
and say that and then I would
237
00:12:16,920 --> 00:12:21,080
just say great.
So that being has what you know,
238
00:12:21,080 --> 00:12:23,880
what caused the being to to be
there.
239
00:12:23,880 --> 00:12:30,120
Like when I say being, I don't
mean I mean existence itself has
240
00:12:30,240 --> 00:12:35,720
has to be around Parmenides
would say a being existence
241
00:12:35,720 --> 00:12:39,680
itself can either come into
existence or go out of
242
00:12:39,680 --> 00:12:41,720
existence.
To come into existence,
243
00:12:41,720 --> 00:12:43,600
something would have had been
there to start it.
244
00:12:44,160 --> 00:12:47,120
It can't go out of existence.
So cause for it to go out of
245
00:12:47,120 --> 00:12:50,080
existence, something has to be
causing it to go out of
246
00:12:50,080 --> 00:12:52,360
existence.
And of course, the next great
247
00:12:52,360 --> 00:13:00,360
philosopher, what's her name,
she sings in Sound of Music.
248
00:13:00,360 --> 00:13:01,480
I can't.
Remember, I can't believe.
249
00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:05,280
Julie Andrews, she sings, you
know, nothing comes from
250
00:13:05,280 --> 00:13:08,360
nothing, nothing ever will.
So she picks up on Parmenides
251
00:13:08,360 --> 00:13:10,040
there.
That's that's the funny part.
252
00:13:10,040 --> 00:13:11,560
But I messed it up by not
remembering her name.
253
00:13:12,800 --> 00:13:19,840
So anyways, so this is This is
why I think a preceptor might
254
00:13:19,840 --> 00:13:22,840
just say this and walk away.
And I'm like, there's more
255
00:13:22,840 --> 00:13:25,840
conversation to be had here
about 'cause.
256
00:13:25,840 --> 00:13:28,360
I, I, I think you're right,
'cause I've listened to a lot of
257
00:13:29,040 --> 00:13:32,960
preceptors, like, argue on this
and that's exactly it.
258
00:13:33,080 --> 00:13:36,920
They, they really do focus on
this, you know, unchanging,
259
00:13:36,920 --> 00:13:39,040
universal, that that's really
what they're beating at Trump
260
00:13:39,040 --> 00:13:40,400
versus like everything you just
said.
261
00:13:40,680 --> 00:13:43,000
And I agree with, I agree with
them.
262
00:13:43,080 --> 00:13:44,760
I'm not saying that I don't
disagree with it.
263
00:13:45,200 --> 00:13:48,760
But it's like one of those
things like you, you can't
264
00:13:48,760 --> 00:13:51,960
expect you to say something and
the other person just to put
265
00:13:51,960 --> 00:13:55,400
down their arms and say, yeah.
Oh, I take you at face value,
266
00:13:55,400 --> 00:13:57,160
right?
Yeah, That that makes sense.
267
00:13:57,680 --> 00:13:59,800
Next area, The uniformity of
nature.
268
00:13:59,920 --> 00:14:01,960
I've heard this get hit on a
lot.
269
00:14:01,960 --> 00:14:04,040
That that really.
Science assumes that what
270
00:14:04,040 --> 00:14:08,240
happens in the future will be
like the past.
271
00:14:08,240 --> 00:14:09,720
Gravity's still gonna work
today.
272
00:14:09,720 --> 00:14:13,280
It's gonna work tomorrow.
Physics don't randomly change.
273
00:14:13,920 --> 00:14:15,760
So.
So the problem is you.
274
00:14:16,080 --> 00:14:17,960
You want to expose This is why
should that be true?
275
00:14:17,960 --> 00:14:20,080
If the universe is random, if
it's unguided, if it's
276
00:14:20,080 --> 00:14:23,320
accidental, then why do you have
this consistency?
277
00:14:23,320 --> 00:14:25,160
Why do you expect the same thing
to happen tomorrow?
278
00:14:25,280 --> 00:14:28,040
I agree that this is good.
It's a good argument.
279
00:14:28,440 --> 00:14:31,600
I I also agree that this would
give us a good indication that
280
00:14:31,600 --> 00:14:33,840
nuclear decay rates don't change
over time.
281
00:14:34,560 --> 00:14:36,240
Oh, OK, there you go.
There you go.
282
00:14:36,280 --> 00:14:41,000
There shots fired for the the
young Earth creationists.
283
00:14:41,000 --> 00:14:43,520
Oh, and and you know, if they're
trying to illustrate this,
284
00:14:43,760 --> 00:14:45,920
'cause I you're getting 2 for
one with Paul Taylor, right?
285
00:14:45,920 --> 00:14:49,800
Right.
I mean, maybe there are, and I
286
00:14:49,800 --> 00:14:51,920
wonder if there are any old
earth presuppers.
287
00:14:51,920 --> 00:14:54,760
I I would just assume that RC
Sproul, I don't know RC Sproul's
288
00:14:54,760 --> 00:14:58,800
creationist view.
I don't know if he's young Earth
289
00:14:58,800 --> 00:14:59,640
or old Earth.
I don't know.
290
00:14:59,640 --> 00:15:02,240
Well, I know that there are
young earth classical
291
00:15:02,240 --> 00:15:04,400
apologetics.
I wonder if there are any old
292
00:15:04,400 --> 00:15:06,320
earth presuppers?
That's what.
293
00:15:06,440 --> 00:15:07,400
Oh, yeah, I see what you're
saying.
294
00:15:07,400 --> 00:15:07,840
Yeah.
Yeah.
295
00:15:07,840 --> 00:15:10,920
I'm trying to think.
I don't know enough presuppers.
296
00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:15,720
Yeah, I don't find out.
'Cause I think you I the presupp
297
00:15:16,400 --> 00:15:19,000
presummers.
I know they tend to have their
298
00:15:19,000 --> 00:15:21,560
young earth presub and Calvinist
that like.
299
00:15:21,640 --> 00:15:23,160
All those three things go.
Together.
300
00:15:23,160 --> 00:15:25,440
Yeah, Yeah, I, I think you might
be right.
301
00:15:25,440 --> 00:15:28,440
And so on this science point,
you know, you wouldn't expect to
302
00:15:28,440 --> 00:15:31,680
wake up tomorrow and gravity's
reversing, fire's freezing or
303
00:15:31,680 --> 00:15:33,760
time runs backwards.
Everyone would say that's
304
00:15:33,760 --> 00:15:35,240
absurd.
You should be like, why is that
305
00:15:35,240 --> 00:15:36,120
so absurd?
Like what?
306
00:15:36,120 --> 00:15:40,320
Why is there even consistency?
Their answer is God is faithful.
307
00:15:40,320 --> 00:15:44,160
He's consistent, He sustains his
creation in an orderly way.
308
00:15:44,160 --> 00:15:46,800
But you atheists, you really
have no, no grounds for this
309
00:15:47,440 --> 00:15:49,040
next one.
Moral absolutes.
310
00:15:49,040 --> 00:15:53,840
People will say murder's wrong,
racism is bad, justice matters.
311
00:15:54,480 --> 00:15:55,600
Probably talked about this
before.
312
00:15:55,600 --> 00:15:59,240
In a godless universe, there's
really no standard, only
313
00:15:59,240 --> 00:16:01,720
preferences or, you know,
evolutions going to do its
314
00:16:01,720 --> 00:16:05,240
thing.
So, so really at the end of the
315
00:16:05,240 --> 00:16:08,520
day, is morality objective?
Is it binding on all people or
316
00:16:08,520 --> 00:16:11,440
is it subjective?
Just a matter opinion.
317
00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:15,040
If it is objective, The classic
question, by what standard?
318
00:16:15,040 --> 00:16:17,600
You gotta have a standard you're
appealing to.
319
00:16:17,600 --> 00:16:19,440
The Christian would say God's
character.
320
00:16:19,440 --> 00:16:23,960
It's not arbitrary.
It's rooted in who God is.
321
00:16:25,120 --> 00:16:27,480
Any all good, all good.
We're we're we're tracking,
322
00:16:27,480 --> 00:16:30,800
we're good.
Let's move on to Section 4.
323
00:16:30,800 --> 00:16:33,600
The impossibility of the
contrary.
324
00:16:34,280 --> 00:16:38,320
Greg Bonson and one of his
debates, one of his, his writing
325
00:16:38,320 --> 00:16:42,080
says the proof of Christianity
is that without it, you couldn't
326
00:16:42,080 --> 00:16:43,800
prove anything.
You're not just saying
327
00:16:43,800 --> 00:16:46,040
Christianity works, but that
everything hinges.
328
00:16:46,040 --> 00:16:49,080
Everything else would fail
without it.
329
00:16:49,160 --> 00:16:55,160
They really hinge in on, sorry,
RC Sproul famously said that not
330
00:16:55,160 --> 00:16:58,440
only do I see the sun, but by
the sun, I see everything
331
00:16:58,560 --> 00:17:00,240
through it.
And I think this is what they're
332
00:17:00,240 --> 00:17:07,359
saying.
And again, I, I think that you
333
00:17:07,359 --> 00:17:10,920
could, you could probably ground
logic in a couple of other
334
00:17:10,920 --> 00:17:12,839
systems.
I don't think those systems are
335
00:17:13,040 --> 00:17:17,560
good for other reasons.
So you, you might, if, if you're
336
00:17:17,560 --> 00:17:22,760
giving this argument that
Christianity, because we're
337
00:17:22,760 --> 00:17:26,000
changing words here, because
above it was like God's
338
00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:29,760
existence.
Now we're going straight to a
339
00:17:29,760 --> 00:17:32,320
particular version of God's
existence.
340
00:17:32,640 --> 00:17:35,680
And I don't know that you can
make that leap just from logic
341
00:17:35,680 --> 00:17:38,040
alone.
That's why we would say give
342
00:17:38,040 --> 00:17:41,680
good evidence that the Bible's
trustworthy, that, you know, all
343
00:17:41,680 --> 00:17:45,000
those things, you know, Christ,
you know, risen from the grave.
344
00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:50,000
You know, if, if a guy says he's
going to die and comes back to
345
00:17:50,000 --> 00:17:53,240
life and then he does that, he's
someone you should listen to,
346
00:17:53,360 --> 00:17:57,920
right?
To start, so so to like recap
347
00:17:57,920 --> 00:18:00,200
some of these arguments of an
atheist says there's no truth,
348
00:18:00,440 --> 00:18:02,840
preceptor might say, is that
statement true?
349
00:18:03,400 --> 00:18:06,680
If an atheist say, hey, my
worldview atheism is based on
350
00:18:06,680 --> 00:18:09,520
science, you might say why even
trust science in a random
351
00:18:09,520 --> 00:18:12,440
universe?
Lastly, an atheist might say
352
00:18:12,440 --> 00:18:15,840
morality is subjective.
Preceptor would respond.
353
00:18:16,320 --> 00:18:18,680
So you're saying genocide's not
objectively wrong?
354
00:18:18,680 --> 00:18:21,040
I think the Holocaust was good,
you know?
355
00:18:21,840 --> 00:18:24,560
Yeah, and these are the exact
same things, I think those types
356
00:18:24,560 --> 00:18:26,880
of things I think a classical
apologist does.
357
00:18:27,040 --> 00:18:32,480
All day long we try to reveal
the the bad thinking that
358
00:18:32,480 --> 00:18:36,840
underlies atheism and the fact
that to be a good consistent
359
00:18:36,840 --> 00:18:41,760
atheist, you have to say that
the Holocaust or not the
360
00:18:41,760 --> 00:18:46,240
Holocaust is is ultimately is
like picking vanilla or
361
00:18:46,240 --> 00:18:48,520
chocolate ice.
Cream, it's just a preference.
362
00:18:48,600 --> 00:18:54,240
Yeah, that is crazy.
Let's skip down to some of this
363
00:18:54,240 --> 00:18:57,880
Sprole Bahnson debate.
I and I thought this debate was
364
00:18:57,880 --> 00:19:00,480
really good.
And I think people people don't
365
00:19:00,480 --> 00:19:02,800
like to enter debates because I
think they especially in this
366
00:19:02,800 --> 00:19:04,800
day and age, you think you're
gonna look bad, get a social
367
00:19:04,800 --> 00:19:06,520
clip.
But this debate was good.
368
00:19:06,520 --> 00:19:09,800
Were they really we're able to
like they in the cross
369
00:19:09,800 --> 00:19:11,720
examination they were able to
talk back and forth a little bit
370
00:19:11,720 --> 00:19:14,120
like it was very friendly.
I thought it was good positive
371
00:19:14,160 --> 00:19:16,480
learning I have.
I need to relisten to this one,
372
00:19:16,480 --> 00:19:19,440
I need to relisten to both of
the Bondsen ones 'cause it's
373
00:19:19,440 --> 00:19:23,160
probably been five years since
I've listened to them, but we
374
00:19:23,160 --> 00:19:29,480
really studied them back in like
I think I graduated 2018, so
375
00:19:29,480 --> 00:19:32,200
maybe like 2015, 2016, We've
really studied them and I've
376
00:19:32,200 --> 00:19:33,560
listened to them a couple times
since then.
377
00:19:33,560 --> 00:19:36,320
But yeah.
Yeah, they're they're they're
378
00:19:36,320 --> 00:19:39,760
good.
Bodson obviously is presub Van
379
00:19:39,760 --> 00:19:43,400
Till style RC sprawl this
classical evidential approach.
380
00:19:43,400 --> 00:19:45,680
They both at the outset would
talk about, you know, we have
381
00:19:45,680 --> 00:19:49,880
firm biblical authority believe
Christianity is rational, reject
382
00:19:49,880 --> 00:19:52,560
neutrality in a total sense,
kind of like what you're you're
383
00:19:52,560 --> 00:19:55,880
like I agree with all these
things, but they differ in how
384
00:19:55,920 --> 00:19:58,840
you would argue for
Christianity, what role human
385
00:19:58,840 --> 00:20:02,480
reason place Bodson this Presub
position.
386
00:20:02,880 --> 00:20:05,200
We've hit these No neutrality
exists.
387
00:20:05,520 --> 00:20:07,320
All reasoning starts with
presuppositions.
388
00:20:07,600 --> 00:20:11,280
Presuppositions #2 God is the
precondition for
389
00:20:11,280 --> 00:20:14,560
intelligibility, logic, science.
Morality only makes sense of
390
00:20:14,560 --> 00:20:18,240
Christianity is true #3.
Again, yeah.
391
00:20:18,240 --> 00:20:23,200
And I, I wonder if you know,
because it says God up top and
392
00:20:23,200 --> 00:20:26,880
Christianity in the sub bullet.
And that's a leap to me, 'cause
393
00:20:26,880 --> 00:20:30,040
there's there's a classical
Christianity would say, a
394
00:20:30,040 --> 00:20:33,600
classical apologetics would say
that is another step to get from
395
00:20:33,960 --> 00:20:38,160
theism to Christianity.
So you're just noticing 'cause
396
00:20:38,160 --> 00:20:42,440
we that's been a, a few of this
year #3 they would use that tag
397
00:20:42,440 --> 00:20:45,920
transitional argument for God to
show that these other non
398
00:20:45,920 --> 00:20:47,960
Christian worldviews collapse
internally.
399
00:20:48,280 --> 00:20:52,200
And then they would reject
autonomous human reason that
400
00:20:52,200 --> 00:20:56,640
your reason must be submitted to
God's revelation because you
401
00:20:56,640 --> 00:20:58,360
could be on the wrong.
I mean, you know, if you're not,
402
00:20:58,360 --> 00:21:04,120
you'll be on the wrong track.
So Sprole his his core point, he
403
00:21:04,160 --> 00:21:06,880
he made the argument that there
is this form of functional
404
00:21:06,880 --> 00:21:08,960
neutrality.
Maybe there's not moral
405
00:21:08,960 --> 00:21:14,040
neutrality, you know, AKA Romans
one, but you can have a thought
406
00:21:14,040 --> 00:21:16,880
experiment, you can have this
rational common grounds if.
407
00:21:17,160 --> 00:21:18,440
If you couldn't, how could you
talk?
408
00:21:18,600 --> 00:21:20,200
With anyone there, you can't.
Yeah, yeah.
409
00:21:20,840 --> 00:21:23,360
And that, that's good.
He really harped on natural
410
00:21:23,360 --> 00:21:25,000
theology we read about in the
Bible.
411
00:21:25,000 --> 00:21:28,920
He was like, and what I loved is
that Sproull was like, hey, you
412
00:21:28,920 --> 00:21:31,600
ever heard of John Calvin?
Like just knowing that like hits
413
00:21:31,600 --> 00:21:34,320
a nerve with with he's like,
he's like, let me quote John
414
00:21:34,320 --> 00:21:39,640
Calvin for you for a little bit.
And he like had his like, quote
415
00:21:39,760 --> 00:21:41,840
his, you know, citations ready
'cause I was like, where is
416
00:21:41,840 --> 00:21:43,000
that?
You know, like, you know, trying
417
00:21:43,000 --> 00:21:47,960
to look at that where Romans 1
supports the arguments for from
418
00:21:47,960 --> 00:21:50,240
creation.
When you look at these other
419
00:21:50,240 --> 00:21:52,480
arguments outside of the
transitional argument,
420
00:21:52,480 --> 00:21:55,440
cosmological argument, the
teleological argument, those are
421
00:21:55,440 --> 00:21:59,200
legitimate as well because the
presub camp like dismisses all
422
00:21:59,200 --> 00:22:01,400
of these other ones.
Like they they say, I don't know
423
00:22:01,400 --> 00:22:05,880
if it's flawed, but they're like
it has been shown like and like
424
00:22:05,880 --> 00:22:07,800
it's like been debunked.
He might have even said
425
00:22:07,800 --> 00:22:09,280
debunked.
I don't know if he said that,
426
00:22:09,280 --> 00:22:11,480
but you know what I mean?
Like says like, oh, those have
427
00:22:11,480 --> 00:22:14,240
been, and it might not have been
Sprole Bonson, but Bonsenstein.
428
00:22:14,240 --> 00:22:16,120
He might have just been
conceding that being like, hey,
429
00:22:16,120 --> 00:22:18,720
I agree.
Those have been, I think Stein
430
00:22:18,720 --> 00:22:22,320
said debunked.
But but you know, Bonson was
431
00:22:22,320 --> 00:22:23,400
like, hey, I'm right there with
you, man.
432
00:22:23,640 --> 00:22:25,320
Yeah, yeah, it's kind of
interesting, right?
433
00:22:27,080 --> 00:22:29,840
Sprole says.
Using evidence and reason to
434
00:22:29,840 --> 00:22:32,360
point to God is good that
Christianity's not just
435
00:22:32,360 --> 00:22:34,800
presupposed, but you can
demonstrate it, you can look out
436
00:22:34,800 --> 00:22:38,040
and see it.
And unbelievers can also reason
437
00:22:38,040 --> 00:22:41,320
truly, maybe not perfectly,
because they they're made in
438
00:22:41,320 --> 00:22:42,600
God's image.
That counts for something.
439
00:22:42,920 --> 00:22:48,520
Right.
Yeah, it seems like they pre
440
00:22:48,520 --> 00:22:52,160
suppers want to take like little
slices here but then take the
441
00:22:52,160 --> 00:22:54,080
other slice there like you know
what I'm saying?
442
00:22:54,680 --> 00:22:55,840
Yeah, I I see what you're
saying.
443
00:22:56,040 --> 00:22:58,080
Yeah, they're not consistent in
what they're doing.
444
00:22:58,320 --> 00:23:03,560
I was just going to read, you
know, Well, Thomas's Doubting is
445
00:23:03,560 --> 00:23:03,720
a.
Big.
446
00:23:03,720 --> 00:23:05,160
Oh yeah, that was it.
Plays a big.
447
00:23:05,160 --> 00:23:12,880
Role in Paul Frank Taylor's book
and I think it comes to the
448
00:23:12,880 --> 00:23:14,840
wrong conclusion on that.
This is good like.
449
00:23:14,840 --> 00:23:17,800
Thomas's doubting is
unreasonable doubting.
450
00:23:17,920 --> 00:23:21,640
He has been given like guess
what, he was given evidence,
451
00:23:21,960 --> 00:23:25,720
eyewitness account of people
seeing Jesus resurrected from
452
00:23:25,720 --> 00:23:28,320
the dead and he saw Jesus's
miracles.
453
00:23:28,640 --> 00:23:32,840
And when he does, when he is
confronted with Jesus, the
454
00:23:32,840 --> 00:23:37,280
person, he, I don't even know
that he actually does like Jesus
455
00:23:37,280 --> 00:23:39,080
says, here's my hands, here's my
side.
456
00:23:39,080 --> 00:23:42,400
And he just falls down his feet
and he says, you know, my Lord,
457
00:23:42,440 --> 00:23:49,040
my God, the very next verse,
John says many more things Jesus
458
00:23:49,040 --> 00:23:51,120
has done.
And you know, we couldn't
459
00:23:51,120 --> 00:23:54,520
contain the count of them.
But these have been written so
460
00:23:54,520 --> 00:23:59,640
that you may believe, right?
John's given evidence right now.
461
00:23:59,640 --> 00:24:02,640
I think a preceptor would say,
well, he's given evidence that I
462
00:24:02,640 --> 00:24:06,160
don't know what that Jesus is
true, but you would never he,
463
00:24:06,680 --> 00:24:08,920
you'd never give evidence that
God exists.
464
00:24:09,160 --> 00:24:10,360
Oh, that's interesting.
Yeah, yeah.
465
00:24:10,440 --> 00:24:13,040
If they would make yeah that.
Hyper the distinction between
466
00:24:13,040 --> 00:24:16,840
those yeah yeah but I just say
that to say like the whole Bible
467
00:24:16,840 --> 00:24:20,640
is evidence Jesus when that's.
A form of evidence.
468
00:24:20,640 --> 00:24:22,680
That's good, yeah.
Yeah, when the the paralytic man
469
00:24:22,680 --> 00:24:28,680
is brought down, he turns to him
and I, I just love you know what
470
00:24:28,680 --> 00:24:31,000
you these pictures you get of
Jesus, 'cause you know, he's
471
00:24:31,000 --> 00:24:35,280
just poking and the Pharisees
and he's like your son, your
472
00:24:35,280 --> 00:24:37,880
sins are forgiven.
And he just kind of waits around
473
00:24:38,080 --> 00:24:41,000
looking, knowing that, that the
and he's like, why are you
474
00:24:41,000 --> 00:24:44,240
grumbling in your heart?
And he says, what's easier to
475
00:24:44,240 --> 00:24:49,120
do, to say your sins are
forgiven or to say rise up and
476
00:24:49,120 --> 00:24:54,240
walk?
And it's 1 is easy to say but
477
00:24:54,240 --> 00:24:57,160
hard to do. 1 is hard to do but
easy to say.
478
00:24:57,600 --> 00:25:02,440
But he says, but so that you
guys can believe that the Son of
479
00:25:02,440 --> 00:25:06,280
man has authority to forgive
sins in heaven on earth, I say
480
00:25:06,280 --> 00:25:10,120
to you, rise up and walk.
And so he's given evidence like
481
00:25:10,120 --> 00:25:14,360
he's he is, he's not just.
Saying only believe, right,
482
00:25:14,600 --> 00:25:16,080
Right, right.
Yeah, yeah.
483
00:25:16,080 --> 00:25:21,280
I'm giving you evidence.
So all the miracles, tongues,
484
00:25:21,440 --> 00:25:23,840
all all that stuff, evidence
that we can believe.
485
00:25:24,360 --> 00:25:26,920
That's great.
Let's talk about is there any
486
00:25:26,920 --> 00:25:28,800
neutral ground?
This was a point of disagreement
487
00:25:28,800 --> 00:25:32,280
in there debate.
Bahnson is totally on the path
488
00:25:32,280 --> 00:25:34,880
of neutrality is a myth.
All reasoning is worldview
489
00:25:34,880 --> 00:25:37,840
driven.
Sprole's kind of like, well, we
490
00:25:37,840 --> 00:25:40,200
we can't have this shared
rational arena 'cause if we
491
00:25:40,200 --> 00:25:43,120
couldn't, we can't argue with
unbelievers at all.
492
00:25:43,120 --> 00:25:46,520
Just I mean, we like we, we like
only have gospel conversations
493
00:25:46,520 --> 00:25:47,960
and that's the only thing you
can have.
494
00:25:48,600 --> 00:25:52,720
Which begs the question, what
what's the role of human reason?
495
00:25:52,720 --> 00:25:54,680
What's the point of human
reason?
496
00:25:55,400 --> 00:25:58,800
Botsa kind of rejects autonomous
reason and says, you know,
497
00:25:58,800 --> 00:26:01,000
you'll look at classical
evidential apologetics.
498
00:26:01,320 --> 00:26:04,400
You're you're given too much,
you're given too much to human
499
00:26:04,400 --> 00:26:09,040
thinking because man has fallen.
Like, what can you expect?
500
00:26:09,080 --> 00:26:11,800
Essentially?
Sprole agrees.
501
00:26:11,800 --> 00:26:15,040
Reason has fallen, but and we're
in God's image there.
502
00:26:15,040 --> 00:26:18,280
There's things we can use.
It's valid, it's usable, and
503
00:26:18,280 --> 00:26:22,960
he's concerned that if you take
a precept view at at some level,
504
00:26:23,040 --> 00:26:25,440
if you don't, even if you don't
believe it, you can sound like
505
00:26:25,440 --> 00:26:27,840
you're undermining rational
argument in of itself 'cause
506
00:26:27,840 --> 00:26:29,880
you're not.
You're like refusing to engage.
507
00:26:30,280 --> 00:26:33,000
If if you're a hyper Calvinist.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
508
00:26:33,000 --> 00:26:37,080
And you believe that you get
I'll use it pejoratively.
509
00:26:37,080 --> 00:26:39,600
I know I'm, I'm poking at you a
little bit, but if you believe
510
00:26:39,600 --> 00:26:44,400
people get zapped and
regenerated and that
511
00:26:44,400 --> 00:26:49,120
regeneration happens before
faith chronologically, so you're
512
00:26:49,120 --> 00:26:52,960
zapped and then sometime later
in your life you come to faith,
513
00:26:53,840 --> 00:26:56,480
then I guess you're OK with
this.
514
00:26:56,760 --> 00:27:01,680
Because when you're given the
gospel, you are reasoning with
515
00:27:01,680 --> 00:27:05,680
people and you are asking them
to make a judgement about their
516
00:27:05,680 --> 00:27:11,200
sin, their guilt, who Christ is.
You cannot get around reasoning
517
00:27:11,320 --> 00:27:13,960
with people.
And I I guess if you're a hyper
518
00:27:13,960 --> 00:27:15,960
Calvinist, you don't have to
give the gospel anyways.
519
00:27:16,560 --> 00:27:18,680
Right.
You don't you don't have to you
520
00:27:18,680 --> 00:27:23,680
don't have to evangelize, but
for us good, the correct normal
521
00:27:24,000 --> 00:27:29,000
Calvinist who believe that God
works sovereignly through both.
522
00:27:29,920 --> 00:27:32,800
He works through means to
accomplish his sovereign end,
523
00:27:33,200 --> 00:27:35,480
then you are going to be
reasoning with someone.
524
00:27:35,480 --> 00:27:38,280
So I think this just cuts too
far.
525
00:27:38,280 --> 00:27:40,880
Like they say it and they think
they're sounding sounding,
526
00:27:40,880 --> 00:27:45,120
saying something good, but it
it's, it's not if, if what
527
00:27:45,120 --> 00:27:48,240
they're saying is true, then you
can't, can't give the gospel out
528
00:27:48,240 --> 00:27:50,440
'cause you're asking people to
reason.
529
00:27:51,280 --> 00:27:55,160
Another point of disagreement,
you know, can you prove God or
530
00:27:55,160 --> 00:27:57,400
only or, or do you presuppose
God?
531
00:27:57,400 --> 00:28:00,720
Bahnson would say God must be
presupposed.
532
00:28:00,720 --> 00:28:04,320
That's the foundation.
Sproul would say You can't argue
533
00:28:04,320 --> 00:28:07,080
for God's existence.
Evidence logic point to and and
534
00:28:07,080 --> 00:28:10,600
underneath that Sproul was
concerned that a pre supper, it
535
00:28:10,600 --> 00:28:12,560
can really just sound like we
assume God.
536
00:28:12,680 --> 00:28:14,240
We don't argue for him.
We just assume him.
537
00:28:14,240 --> 00:28:18,440
We're not going to say anything.
And he wanted some of these
538
00:28:18,440 --> 00:28:20,920
arguments like we've talked
about in previous episode, to be
539
00:28:20,920 --> 00:28:25,320
accessible to to unbelievers.
And if you're just not going to
540
00:28:25,320 --> 00:28:27,560
talk about these, it's like
they're just not there, you know
541
00:28:27,560 --> 00:28:29,200
what I mean?
Yeah, it's hard for me to go
542
00:28:29,200 --> 00:28:33,080
from three to to four.
We don't prove God, we
543
00:28:33,080 --> 00:28:36,240
presuppose him.
The transcendental argument for
544
00:28:36,240 --> 00:28:39,040
God is the ultimate proof of
that God exists.
545
00:28:39,520 --> 00:28:41,480
Yeah, yeah, I, I, I know what
you're saying.
546
00:28:41,480 --> 00:28:43,680
And it's like, that's the,
that's like the one argument
547
00:28:43,680 --> 00:28:48,120
they'll hang their hat on.
Sproul likes like you, the
548
00:28:48,160 --> 00:28:52,200
traditional argument.
But he does question, you know,
549
00:28:52,200 --> 00:28:54,920
sometimes.
He's basically saying there's
550
00:28:54,920 --> 00:28:56,520
other arguments you can use, you
know?
551
00:28:56,800 --> 00:28:58,960
Yeah.
And I think what Sproul points
552
00:28:58,960 --> 00:29:04,960
out here is the fact that when
we're talking like this, you use
553
00:29:04,960 --> 00:29:07,920
a transcendental argument to try
to say that people know God
554
00:29:07,920 --> 00:29:12,320
exist and what?
But in practice, when you use
555
00:29:12,320 --> 00:29:17,200
it, you yes, this is you are you
are saying that therefore God
556
00:29:17,200 --> 00:29:19,640
does exist, not therefore you
know God exists.
557
00:29:19,680 --> 00:29:21,120
And those are different
statements.
558
00:29:22,400 --> 00:29:25,040
And that kind of leads to this
main concerns that your
559
00:29:25,040 --> 00:29:26,800
arguments can sound very
circular.
560
00:29:27,160 --> 00:29:30,280
You must believe in God to prove
God and it can feel like
561
00:29:30,280 --> 00:29:33,040
question begging.
It can be unpersuasive at the no
562
00:29:33,040 --> 00:29:36,160
one, no one likes.
Same thing with Paul Frank
563
00:29:36,160 --> 00:29:39,600
Taylor's book.
You know all he would say.
564
00:29:39,600 --> 00:29:42,960
All of the evidence looks like
it's points to evolution when
565
00:29:42,960 --> 00:29:48,000
you're an evolutionist.
OK, I guess it's OK to be an
566
00:29:48,000 --> 00:29:50,280
evolutionist because they don't
see anything wrong with the
567
00:29:50,280 --> 00:29:52,840
evidence, right?
There, there, there you go.
568
00:29:53,400 --> 00:29:57,320
Spro was also concerned that it
it your natural revelation is
569
00:29:57,320 --> 00:29:59,240
there.
You're totally downplaying it.
570
00:29:59,560 --> 00:30:03,680
Even though you affirm Romans 1
presuppers, you're not utilizing
571
00:30:03,680 --> 00:30:06,440
these natural theology arguments
and and there's missed
572
00:30:06,440 --> 00:30:08,000
opportunities everywhere you
look.
573
00:30:08,760 --> 00:30:13,320
There is a reason you you're
able to reason from creation to
574
00:30:13,360 --> 00:30:16,400
creator that that's a big part
of natural revelation.
575
00:30:17,000 --> 00:30:20,120
He's also concerned that it
makes Christians seem anti
576
00:30:20,120 --> 00:30:24,880
intellectual if misunderstood.
It can be like evidence doesn't
577
00:30:24,880 --> 00:30:27,760
matter, reason doesn't work and
it's like we don't want to be.
578
00:30:27,760 --> 00:30:29,520
We don't want to be like in that
camp.
579
00:30:30,000 --> 00:30:34,360
Yeah, Ken Ham specifically said
I am no longer going to provide
580
00:30:34,360 --> 00:30:38,360
evidence that creation is true.
I'm just going to try to shotgun
581
00:30:38,360 --> 00:30:41,920
your worldview, your
presuppositions.
582
00:30:42,720 --> 00:30:44,880
I'm going to say that your
presuppositions are bad.
583
00:30:44,880 --> 00:30:47,160
And you, if you start with the
right presuppositions, then
584
00:30:47,160 --> 00:30:48,840
you'll you'll end up the right
spot.
585
00:30:48,840 --> 00:30:50,880
That's like that's.
Yeah.
586
00:30:50,880 --> 00:30:51,920
Is that super?
Helpful.
587
00:30:52,080 --> 00:30:54,080
That's not helpful.
And and it leads to something
588
00:30:54,080 --> 00:30:56,160
that that Sprole really was
concerned about.
589
00:30:56,160 --> 00:30:59,880
It risked miscommunication and
evangelism that you can make it
590
00:30:59,880 --> 00:31:01,560
inaccessible.
You can like shut down
591
00:31:01,560 --> 00:31:04,320
conversations.
That could be you're just going
592
00:31:04,320 --> 00:31:05,440
to, you're not throwing out of
these seats.
593
00:31:05,440 --> 00:31:06,640
You're just like, boom, boom,
boom.
594
00:31:06,640 --> 00:31:08,760
Yes, Sir, you know.
Yeah, yeah, there.
595
00:31:09,200 --> 00:31:11,000
You know, Harold, camping people
would.
596
00:31:11,320 --> 00:31:14,680
They would try to rile him up,
they'd call him call up and say,
597
00:31:14,680 --> 00:31:16,560
Hey, what, what must I do to be
saved?
598
00:31:16,560 --> 00:31:18,640
And he would say, I can't tell
you what to do to be saved.
599
00:31:19,920 --> 00:31:21,920
That's a sovereign work of God
in your heart.
600
00:31:22,400 --> 00:31:25,480
And so and and I mean, I think
he's being consistent with his
601
00:31:25,480 --> 00:31:28,280
hyper Calvinism.
So if you're a hyper Calvinist,
602
00:31:28,280 --> 00:31:30,440
then it doesn't really matter if
you miscommunicating the
603
00:31:30,440 --> 00:31:33,240
evangelism or not.
You don't have to be winsome,
604
00:31:33,240 --> 00:31:38,760
which, you know, at the end of
end of his book, Paul Frank
605
00:31:38,760 --> 00:31:41,160
Taylor's book, he talks about
being winsome.
606
00:31:41,280 --> 00:31:45,520
Why you had to be winsome.
Just if God is going to just,
607
00:31:45,600 --> 00:31:49,120
you know, without means save
people, you don't have to worry
608
00:31:49,120 --> 00:31:51,440
about this.
But if, if you're not a hyper
609
00:31:51,440 --> 00:31:54,560
Calvinist, then all these things
do matter.
610
00:31:54,720 --> 00:31:56,960
You do want to clearly
communicate the gospel.
611
00:31:57,360 --> 00:32:00,800
I, you know, not that I think I,
I do think God is sovereign in
612
00:32:00,800 --> 00:32:03,120
who's going to believe.
So I don't think that I'm going
613
00:32:03,120 --> 00:32:08,280
to stop someone from entering
the Kingdom, but man, I could be
614
00:32:08,280 --> 00:32:12,080
a stumbling block to them from
being a Kingdom, right and and
615
00:32:12,280 --> 00:32:14,960
cause more heartache and, you
know, not be a good faithful
616
00:32:14,960 --> 00:32:18,600
servant to to Christ if I'm not
clearly communicating so.
617
00:32:19,680 --> 00:32:22,840
No, I, I, I think, I think all
of that is good.
618
00:32:24,720 --> 00:32:28,040
And really I think that that's
where a good place to end.
619
00:32:28,200 --> 00:32:30,480
Yeah, Talk a lot of priests up.
Got it out there.
620
00:32:30,480 --> 00:32:34,600
I think we did a good job of
articulating what they, but I
621
00:32:34,600 --> 00:32:37,160
think most preceptors, maybe
they don't appreciate all the
622
00:32:37,160 --> 00:32:39,320
push back.
But I think we like, I'm saying
623
00:32:39,320 --> 00:32:41,600
buzzwords that I, I mean, and
I'm not the expert, but made all
624
00:32:41,600 --> 00:32:43,640
the videos watching, it's like
they're saying these exact kind
625
00:32:43,640 --> 00:32:45,200
of things.
Yeah, yeah.
626
00:32:45,200 --> 00:32:49,280
And at least when I bought the
book, it was on sale for like
627
00:32:49,280 --> 00:32:53,480
$2.50.
So you can get only believe at
628
00:32:53,480 --> 00:32:58,840
least a couple weeks ago for
like 2, two, 2 1/2 bucks.
629
00:32:58,840 --> 00:33:03,080
So perhaps it's still on sale.
You can get it an audible list
630
00:33:03,080 --> 00:33:04,280
to it.
It's not a long read.
631
00:33:04,480 --> 00:33:09,560
It's like 4 hours, four and. 1/2
And really the goal is to some
632
00:33:09,560 --> 00:33:12,080
people might say Bonson is
inaccessible.
633
00:33:12,520 --> 00:33:15,480
It's really there to be like,
hey, here's like an on ramp or,
634
00:33:15,520 --> 00:33:17,000
you know, really understand,
'cause sometimes you can read
635
00:33:17,000 --> 00:33:19,240
Bonson be like or Van Till and
be like, I don't know what
636
00:33:19,240 --> 00:33:21,040
you're talking about.
Well, there, yeah.
637
00:33:21,280 --> 00:33:28,080
It's like, I don't know, like
Hegel comes along after Kant and
638
00:33:28,080 --> 00:33:31,560
philosophy and like there's
different types of Hegelians
639
00:33:31,560 --> 00:33:33,240
after him.
Like there's like two different
640
00:33:33,240 --> 00:33:38,240
camps and Karl Marx is in one of
those camps and 'cause there's
641
00:33:38,280 --> 00:33:40,080
they just disagree on what he
was saying.
642
00:33:40,080 --> 00:33:42,520
And I think from what I
understand, there's two
643
00:33:42,520 --> 00:33:45,360
different Van Till camps too.
Like they're like, they're like,
644
00:33:45,680 --> 00:33:48,320
that's not what Van Till meant.
Like, Oh yes, it is.
645
00:33:48,600 --> 00:33:53,160
So yeah.
To be fair, I've not read a Van
646
00:33:53,160 --> 00:33:56,040
Till book.
I've not read a Bonson book.
647
00:33:56,160 --> 00:34:00,800
I've listened to Bonson.
I may I don't know if we have
648
00:34:00,800 --> 00:34:04,000
any recordings of Vantil.
It seems like we did play a
649
00:34:04,000 --> 00:34:08,440
recording of Vantil in in that
class, but it I I could be
650
00:34:08,440 --> 00:34:10,280
wrong, it was a long time ago.
That's great.
651
00:34:10,280 --> 00:34:14,760
Even listening to like these old
debates, which I think the Bonds
652
00:34:14,760 --> 00:34:17,320
and Stein ones like from like
1985 or something, it's not that
653
00:34:17,320 --> 00:34:20,080
old, but it's like the audio and
stuff like it just sound.
654
00:34:20,080 --> 00:34:22,080
It sounds really old.
It's not that old, but sound
655
00:34:22,080 --> 00:34:22,960
it's I'm like what?
What?
656
00:34:23,199 --> 00:34:24,440
I was like what year was this on
what?
657
00:34:24,440 --> 00:34:26,880
Was y'all not thinking ahead and
trying to preserve this for
658
00:34:26,880 --> 00:34:28,880
posterity?
Like get a good digital camera
659
00:34:28,880 --> 00:34:30,280
there with like 4K, you know?
Yeah.
660
00:34:31,360 --> 00:34:33,040
What are Yeah, what are we doing
here?
661
00:34:33,040 --> 00:34:36,159
It's like that's yeah, that's
and that's only 1985.
662
00:34:36,159 --> 00:34:38,280
That's like not that long ago.
It just seems like it's a long
663
00:34:38,280 --> 00:34:40,360
time.
It's like it is it's. 40 years
664
00:34:40,360 --> 00:34:42,280
ago.
We're like, you know, you see
665
00:34:42,280 --> 00:34:46,000
these things where you're like,
we're closer to 19, seven, you
666
00:34:46,000 --> 00:34:48,159
know, you know, it's like we're
farther away from that than
667
00:34:48,159 --> 00:34:49,960
this.
We're like, oh, time is like
668
00:34:49,960 --> 00:34:52,120
does not slow down.
I know it's crazy.
669
00:34:52,199 --> 00:34:54,320
It is crazy.
Man, well, good.
670
00:34:54,320 --> 00:34:56,120
I think this is a great time to
transition.
671
00:34:56,199 --> 00:34:58,160
Some of us were born in the late
1900s.
672
00:34:58,760 --> 00:35:01,680
I know that's that's insane.
Yeah, that's very true.
673
00:35:02,320 --> 00:35:04,560
Well, let's let's get to the our
final take here.
674
00:35:04,560 --> 00:35:08,480
Oh yeah, you heard about Jade
and Ivy?
675
00:35:08,480 --> 00:35:10,240
I heard about it, yeah.
Yeah.
676
00:35:11,080 --> 00:35:13,080
I didn't really look into all
the details, but from what I
677
00:35:13,080 --> 00:35:17,240
heard, it seemed like not a
great, not a great situation.
678
00:35:17,240 --> 00:35:20,280
It's it the way it was painted
to me or what I read was like
679
00:35:20,280 --> 00:35:22,520
this guy's a he believer.
He tweeted something, hurry, I
680
00:35:22,520 --> 00:35:25,400
don't remember what he said.
And then he was like, released
681
00:35:25,400 --> 00:35:27,000
by the Bulls.
Yeah.
682
00:35:27,000 --> 00:35:29,160
And and it was like, I don't
know how good a basketball
683
00:35:29,160 --> 00:35:31,080
player he is.
Like, is he, is he good enough
684
00:35:31,080 --> 00:35:32,080
that he shouldn't have been
released?
685
00:35:32,080 --> 00:35:34,840
Or is he like so so and like?
We don't need the controversy.
686
00:35:34,920 --> 00:35:36,200
I don't know.
I don't follow the Easter.
687
00:35:36,200 --> 00:35:37,720
I mean, I don't follow
basketball closes.
688
00:35:37,720 --> 00:35:42,200
I I used to he he.
Posted Sorry.
689
00:35:42,200 --> 00:35:45,640
He posted a video on Instagram
Live criticizing the NBA support
690
00:35:45,640 --> 00:35:49,080
of the LGBTQ community and Pride
Month, labeling it as
691
00:35:49,080 --> 00:35:53,160
unrighteous.
It was a 42 minute video.
692
00:35:53,160 --> 00:35:56,120
He discussed his religious
beliefs and claimed God did not
693
00:35:56,120 --> 00:35:59,680
create men to be with men or
woman to be with a woman.
694
00:36:00,760 --> 00:36:04,880
The Bulls, who had just required
acquired Ivy from Detroit in
695
00:36:04,880 --> 00:36:08,840
February, cited conduct
detrimental to the team for his
696
00:36:08,840 --> 00:36:11,640
release.
So they just traded for him and
697
00:36:11,640 --> 00:36:14,360
released them.
He's one of those guys he was
698
00:36:14,360 --> 00:36:16,480
supposed to be good.
Like I think he was a high
699
00:36:16,480 --> 00:36:20,000
lottery pick, like four or five
or seven overall.
700
00:36:20,400 --> 00:36:22,960
And I think he was like he was
kind of, he was fine.
701
00:36:23,200 --> 00:36:25,720
He wasn't, he wasn't great, but
I think they're, I mean, he has
702
00:36:25,720 --> 00:36:28,000
some athletic ability if you're
picked that high.
703
00:36:28,800 --> 00:36:32,000
So I I don't follow him too
closely, but I feel like that
704
00:36:32,000 --> 00:36:34,280
that's the one topic you like
don't talk about.
705
00:36:34,600 --> 00:36:36,880
Oh yeah, you can't.
I mean, John Morant like has
706
00:36:36,880 --> 00:36:40,520
Instagram videos, multiple of
him, like holding a gun, you get
707
00:36:40,520 --> 00:36:42,600
suspended for a few games,
you're back, but it's like kind
708
00:36:42,600 --> 00:36:45,440
of crazy that that's like, you
know, I mean, that's not
709
00:36:45,440 --> 00:36:49,640
tolerated by NBA, but by
comparison, it is like it is
710
00:36:49,640 --> 00:36:52,320
kind of a it's like multiple
times he has a gun out.
711
00:36:52,400 --> 00:36:56,880
It's like, what are what?
Are we doing so Trayvon
712
00:36:56,880 --> 00:36:59,960
Henderson?
Man, I like this guy despite him
713
00:36:59,960 --> 00:37:03,320
being from Ohio State.
Oh man, that's tough to get
714
00:37:03,320 --> 00:37:03,960
over.
But yeah.
715
00:37:03,960 --> 00:37:04,680
It is tough.
He's.
716
00:37:04,680 --> 00:37:06,360
A patriot.
And he's a patriot.
717
00:37:06,360 --> 00:37:10,600
Strikes, man, that's very tough.
But man, just a believer, I
718
00:37:10,600 --> 00:37:11,040
think.
I've been.
719
00:37:11,160 --> 00:37:13,200
I've talked.
About them before I think.
720
00:37:13,880 --> 00:37:18,360
Like he had this video out about
like, hey, I was in sexual sin
721
00:37:18,520 --> 00:37:22,400
and couldn't keep going and I
had to tell my my girlfriend at
722
00:37:22,400 --> 00:37:25,920
the time, who now is his wife.
Like we can't keep doing this.
723
00:37:25,920 --> 00:37:30,680
Like I got to anyone who's going
to be like that vulnerable in a
724
00:37:31,080 --> 00:37:34,440
society that you say that's
crazy.
725
00:37:34,440 --> 00:37:37,360
Like I think he's the real deal.
You know, I don't know why he
726
00:37:37,400 --> 00:37:39,880
would.
Yeah, I mean, obviously I don't
727
00:37:40,280 --> 00:37:43,200
I don't know him well enough to
really know, but all indications
728
00:37:43,200 --> 00:37:45,600
are.
So he came out in in in support
729
00:37:45,600 --> 00:37:51,480
of Ivy and and tweeted us like,
you know, then retweeted and
730
00:37:51,480 --> 00:37:55,040
was, you know, saying basically.
That and a lot of other Patriots
731
00:37:55,040 --> 00:37:57,880
were getting on board, coaching
staff in particular.
732
00:37:57,880 --> 00:37:59,920
Oh, wow.
Well, I don't know about the I
733
00:37:59,920 --> 00:38:02,080
think there are other believers.
I don't know how he got on
734
00:38:02,080 --> 00:38:05,200
board.
But then Mike Vrabel was asked.
735
00:38:05,760 --> 00:38:08,600
And did you hear what?
He said no, I didn't hear what?
736
00:38:08,600 --> 00:38:11,520
He said, Oh, yeah.
So Mike Vrabel basically said,
737
00:38:11,520 --> 00:38:13,200
yeah, you know, I like
Henderson.
738
00:38:13,200 --> 00:38:15,920
He's a young guy.
I'm paraphrasing, so this is not
739
00:38:15,920 --> 00:38:17,160
a direct quote, so I might get
it.
740
00:38:17,480 --> 00:38:19,720
And he's like, yeah, we want
people to believe what they want
741
00:38:19,720 --> 00:38:21,640
to believe, but yeah, we need to
school them up to be more
742
00:38:21,640 --> 00:38:23,520
inclusive when, you know, in
media.
743
00:38:23,520 --> 00:38:27,680
So basically he's saying
Henderson needs to learn to be
744
00:38:27,680 --> 00:38:30,440
more inclusive with.
His I know where this is going
745
00:38:30,440 --> 00:38:33,680
and that makes that insane.
Yeah, because, like, wait a
746
00:38:33,680 --> 00:38:36,240
minute, are you inclusive of
Henderson's beliefs?
747
00:38:36,240 --> 00:38:40,320
Like, you know, there's, there's
probably been a lot for me to
748
00:38:40,320 --> 00:38:43,240
get ticked off at the Patriots
that I haven't.
749
00:38:43,240 --> 00:38:46,640
But like, this really has put a
sour taste in my mouth over
750
00:38:46,640 --> 00:38:49,160
Brabel.
Like it's like there.
751
00:38:49,400 --> 00:38:51,160
But nothing else happened with
April, which was good.
752
00:38:51,160 --> 00:38:54,040
It just stopped there, right?
So two days later, I think it
753
00:38:54,040 --> 00:38:56,640
was like literally 2 days later.
Bad timings.
754
00:38:56,640 --> 00:38:59,520
Incredible.
He gets caught with a picture
755
00:38:59,520 --> 00:39:02,400
holding hands with some other
married woman and he's a married
756
00:39:02,400 --> 00:39:05,280
guy.
Man, it's like, you know, it's
757
00:39:05,280 --> 00:39:07,960
like.
God, putting the spotlight on
758
00:39:08,080 --> 00:39:10,480
immorality like you going to,
you're going to call out this
759
00:39:10,480 --> 00:39:12,080
guy and this is what?
You're doing.
760
00:39:12,080 --> 00:39:14,000
That's crazy.
So.
761
00:39:14,400 --> 00:39:16,360
What had the Patriots said
anything at this point?
762
00:39:16,360 --> 00:39:19,120
What's?
The Vrabel released a statement.
763
00:39:19,120 --> 00:39:20,360
He said he wanted to talk to the
team.
764
00:39:20,360 --> 00:39:22,720
He said I had a long time.
This woman was random or was she
765
00:39:22,720 --> 00:39:24,240
affiliated with the team or
anything?
766
00:39:24,240 --> 00:39:26,400
I can't.
I don't know.
767
00:39:26,400 --> 00:39:27,520
Why don't you look that up on
him?
768
00:39:28,800 --> 00:39:33,120
My, my, the back of my mind says
she was some type of reporter.
769
00:39:33,120 --> 00:39:34,960
But I could be wrong.
That could be like totally
770
00:39:34,960 --> 00:39:39,960
wrong, but he said he wanted to
talk to the team first.
771
00:39:39,960 --> 00:39:43,480
And I guess they're kind of.
She, yeah, she worked for The
772
00:39:43,480 --> 00:39:47,160
Athletic, but it led to her
resigning.
773
00:39:47,160 --> 00:39:51,480
She's probably forced to resign
from The Athletic, the sports
774
00:39:51,480 --> 00:39:53,240
publication.
She was some type of.
775
00:39:53,240 --> 00:39:54,240
Reporter So I'm sorry about
that.
776
00:39:55,000 --> 00:39:57,640
Yeah.
So, yeah, just.
777
00:39:58,440 --> 00:40:02,800
He said he wanted to talk.
And he said that he, he released
778
00:40:02,800 --> 00:40:04,440
a statement.
You know, it was one of those
779
00:40:04,440 --> 00:40:08,600
very vanilla like, you know, I
value family and stuff.
780
00:40:08,600 --> 00:40:11,040
And I've had some tough
conversations with the team and
781
00:40:11,040 --> 00:40:14,320
with my family members and, you
know, so.
782
00:40:14,840 --> 00:40:18,160
Yeah, that's crazy that it is
interesting that she.
783
00:40:18,240 --> 00:40:23,400
Yeah, I guess, man, that is
insane.
784
00:40:23,400 --> 00:40:27,160
I wonder what press coverage has
she written on the Patriots or
785
00:40:27,160 --> 00:40:31,280
what was her area like I was.
Wondering it it is such like a a
786
00:40:32,360 --> 00:40:33,680
disgusting.
Yeah.
787
00:40:33,880 --> 00:40:37,560
Set of events for me, it's like
I haven't dove into it and I've
788
00:40:37,560 --> 00:40:39,120
been busy like we talked about
them.
789
00:40:39,320 --> 00:40:43,040
Yeah, yeah.
Last weeks podcast.
790
00:40:43,080 --> 00:40:46,400
Man, that is.
And the crazy thing, I think
791
00:40:46,400 --> 00:40:48,640
this is going to be like second
week of May when this hits.
792
00:40:48,640 --> 00:40:52,560
So we're really going to be
removed when this when this airs
793
00:40:52,560 --> 00:40:54,760
because we're trying to get a
little bit ahead for the summer.
794
00:40:54,760 --> 00:40:56,880
But yeah.
Yeah, I really wonder what's the
795
00:40:57,080 --> 00:41:01,800
do you know what the not maybe
not blowback, but the response
796
00:41:01,800 --> 00:41:05,200
has been are people like most
people like man, hypocrite,
797
00:41:05,200 --> 00:41:07,240
inconsistent or they're like,
hey, people just have different
798
00:41:07,240 --> 00:41:08,120
views.
Like it's fine.
799
00:41:08,120 --> 00:41:09,720
Like, are people like no big
deal?
800
00:41:10,440 --> 00:41:17,600
I I on the the patriots link
that I saw where he posted his
801
00:41:17,600 --> 00:41:21,360
views, the comments were we
still love you coach.
802
00:41:21,360 --> 00:41:23,680
Just keep coaching.
Well, it's just the same.
803
00:41:23,680 --> 00:41:27,960
It's like the same thing from,
you know?
804
00:41:28,400 --> 00:41:31,400
Yeah, it seems like the whole
whole culture's that way.
805
00:41:31,400 --> 00:41:33,760
It's so funny.
I was at a work meeting last
806
00:41:33,760 --> 00:41:35,240
week.
Like we had a bunch of like, my
807
00:41:35,240 --> 00:41:41,240
boss came to town and she like
manages South Carolina now, but
808
00:41:41,240 --> 00:41:43,440
she also made it like our New
England footprints.
809
00:41:43,920 --> 00:41:47,080
And it just is like so different
in New England.
810
00:41:47,320 --> 00:41:50,360
Like she was like telling a
story about like we were talking
811
00:41:50,360 --> 00:41:52,440
about like dress code.
Like, oh, you know, what are
812
00:41:52,440 --> 00:41:54,200
people you know to work?
What are we allowed to wear?
813
00:41:54,200 --> 00:41:55,200
And she's like, Can you believe
it?
814
00:41:55,200 --> 00:41:58,280
Like someone like we allow
people to wear like whatever
815
00:41:58,280 --> 00:41:59,560
they want as long as they look
professional.
816
00:41:59,560 --> 00:42:01,440
Like we don't have strict rules.
We used to have strict rules
817
00:42:01,440 --> 00:42:04,600
like khakis and like now you can
wear scrubs as long as it looks
818
00:42:04,600 --> 00:42:06,400
nice T-shirt.
She's like, well, we had someone
819
00:42:06,920 --> 00:42:09,360
they wore AT shirt that says
like that said like God's got
820
00:42:09,360 --> 00:42:12,080
this or something and they're
like, boy, it was like the worst
821
00:42:12,080 --> 00:42:14,320
thing in the world.
And we were all kind of like
822
00:42:15,320 --> 00:42:17,040
like there were like so many
patient complaints.
823
00:42:17,040 --> 00:42:19,440
Everyone was calling and it was
huge things like everywhere she
824
00:42:19,440 --> 00:42:20,480
went for patience.
Terrible.
825
00:42:20,480 --> 00:42:23,560
I was like, if you wear that
hair, like you get like brownie
826
00:42:23,560 --> 00:42:25,920
points, like, you know, it's
like it's like a whole different
827
00:42:25,960 --> 00:42:27,320
a.
Whole different thing.
828
00:42:27,320 --> 00:42:32,200
Because even if you don't like
if you, you can probably find a
829
00:42:32,200 --> 00:42:34,920
few here, but the average
person, even if they're not
830
00:42:34,920 --> 00:42:37,760
religious, if you said something
like, hey, can I pray for you?
831
00:42:37,760 --> 00:42:40,240
Or they'd be like, sure, you can
pray for me.
832
00:42:40,240 --> 00:42:41,560
I don't care.
Like they're not going to be
833
00:42:41,600 --> 00:42:43,720
offended at it.
Like, 'cause there's still at
834
00:42:43,720 --> 00:42:47,600
least you know, enough in the
culture that yeah.
835
00:42:47,640 --> 00:42:50,280
It is it is crazy like I and
they all kept talking about
836
00:42:50,280 --> 00:42:52,000
things.
It's like we would like never.
837
00:42:52,000 --> 00:42:54,000
And it's like, hey, like I've
been it's so funny.
838
00:42:54,000 --> 00:42:56,640
Like for these, you know, you
walk around the different
839
00:42:56,640 --> 00:42:58,160
assisted livings.
I've been at places and they're
840
00:42:58,160 --> 00:43:01,080
like, hey, Zach, you go to
church, pray for our lunch or
841
00:43:01,080 --> 00:43:01,960
whatever, or you know what I
mean?
842
00:43:01,960 --> 00:43:04,760
It's like a it's like a thing
that like, and it's like older
843
00:43:04,760 --> 00:43:06,840
people too, where it's like we
pray for everything and all
844
00:43:06,840 --> 00:43:10,120
these things too, where they
like she was like, I cannot
845
00:43:10,120 --> 00:43:12,120
believe you, you.
You it would.
846
00:43:12,120 --> 00:43:12,880
It would.
It would be.
847
00:43:13,560 --> 00:43:15,080
It would.
Be like, you could even pray.
848
00:43:15,080 --> 00:43:17,560
It's so generic too.
It's not even, it's like.
849
00:43:17,720 --> 00:43:21,120
I know.
I wonder she should wear a shirt
850
00:43:21,120 --> 00:43:26,040
that says Allah's got this and.
See with social experiment, yes.
851
00:43:27,920 --> 00:43:37,120
What's your take on this Allah?
You know, Allah is just the word
852
00:43:37,200 --> 00:43:38,240
that they.
Use for God.
853
00:43:38,760 --> 00:43:42,600
So Coptic, like Egyptian
Christians, they pray to Allah
854
00:43:42,600 --> 00:43:45,680
because that's the word, that's
their word and their language
855
00:43:45,680 --> 00:43:50,240
for God.
So but you know, for us, if
856
00:43:50,240 --> 00:43:53,040
someone says a law, it's like,
oh, you're definitely Muslim,
857
00:43:53,120 --> 00:43:54,560
you're in Islam.
Yeah, yeah.
858
00:43:55,160 --> 00:43:58,040
Yeah, I don't.
Yeah, we have I've.
859
00:43:58,040 --> 00:44:00,600
So could you could could you as
a Christian wear a shirt that
860
00:44:00,600 --> 00:44:02,440
says Allah has got this and be
OK?
861
00:44:02,560 --> 00:44:04,920
Or do you think you know?
Yeah, I, I probably would not.
862
00:44:04,920 --> 00:44:10,440
I probably would have to like
fully commit to like whatever,
863
00:44:11,040 --> 00:44:13,680
whatever language you know, and
just like have it like straight
864
00:44:13,680 --> 00:44:16,120
one way.
Yeah, I, I, I, I, I would.
865
00:44:16,120 --> 00:44:17,400
I wouldn't.
I wouldn't love it.
866
00:44:18,040 --> 00:44:19,920
For me.
Yeah, for me.
867
00:44:20,040 --> 00:44:24,760
Yeah, yeah.
What about Thor's?
868
00:44:24,760 --> 00:44:27,520
Got this.
No, I wouldn't like that.
869
00:44:27,520 --> 00:44:29,040
Well, I'm saying she could wear
that.
870
00:44:29,320 --> 00:44:31,560
Oh yeah, it's probably fine.
Probably like totally fine,
871
00:44:31,720 --> 00:44:33,560
yeah, probably good.
Probably celebrated.
872
00:44:33,560 --> 00:44:35,520
Zeus has got this.
Yeah, yeah, I know.
873
00:44:35,520 --> 00:44:37,920
It's like, it's one of those
things, it's like.
874
00:44:37,920 --> 00:44:40,320
And God is so generic.
So generic like what?
875
00:44:40,480 --> 00:44:43,040
Yeah.
Brahma's got this, Vishnu's got
876
00:44:43,040 --> 00:44:46,320
this.
Yeah, You know, it was just like
877
00:44:46,320 --> 00:44:48,280
such a, it was one of those
things like, wow, it is like a
878
00:44:48,280 --> 00:44:51,200
different, the word that was
like a huge like HR violent.
879
00:44:51,200 --> 00:44:52,560
Like it went all the way up the
chain.
880
00:44:52,560 --> 00:44:55,840
It was like a big deal.
And it's like down here, like,
881
00:44:55,840 --> 00:44:57,640
not just way different, you
know?
882
00:44:57,880 --> 00:45:00,560
Yeah.
So you can wear anything, but
883
00:45:00,560 --> 00:45:03,080
not that.
Yeah, yeah, really.
884
00:45:03,080 --> 00:45:05,920
Well, they made it really like
you can't wear like graphic Tees
885
00:45:05,920 --> 00:45:07,680
or words.
It's just got to be like, you
886
00:45:07,680 --> 00:45:09,960
wear a black T-shirt if you want
to, or you know, you can wear a
887
00:45:09,960 --> 00:45:13,240
polo, but try not to wear things
that have words on it, so.
888
00:45:13,240 --> 00:45:14,720
You couldn't wear a shirt for
The Beatles.
889
00:45:15,720 --> 00:45:19,880
Yeah, there you go.
Fox, what are you gonna do?
890
00:45:22,200 --> 00:45:25,440
There you go.
Well, that that was this is that
891
00:45:25,440 --> 00:45:27,680
wraps a precept.
Yeah, I think you had another
892
00:45:27,680 --> 00:45:30,200
tab there, but I think, I mean
they don't want to hear me
893
00:45:30,240 --> 00:45:33,040
diatribe in on precept for three
episodes.
894
00:45:33,320 --> 00:45:37,360
That's just yeah, make our whole
podcast I I love it.
895
00:45:37,360 --> 00:45:38,920
Who knows what our next series
is?
896
00:45:39,360 --> 00:45:40,880
Oh, I think you do know what?
Maybe 1.
897
00:45:40,880 --> 00:45:42,760
I don't know if it comes after
this or comes on the other day.
898
00:45:42,760 --> 00:45:44,240
I think it'll come after this.
Yeah.
899
00:45:44,240 --> 00:45:48,320
I think I'm gonna do just a
short one on spiritual warfare.
900
00:45:48,320 --> 00:45:49,920
It's good I.
Don't know what I don't know
901
00:45:49,920 --> 00:45:51,640
what I was listening to, but I
was like, we need to do a
902
00:45:51,640 --> 00:45:53,680
podcast on spiritual warfare.
And this is like when we were
903
00:45:53,680 --> 00:45:58,120
deep in the middle of a cult.
And it's so funny to me because
904
00:45:58,120 --> 00:46:03,880
starting with the Catholic one,
the the, the Mary and prayer to
905
00:46:03,880 --> 00:46:05,840
the Saints, we're like, this is
probably our last one.
906
00:46:06,480 --> 00:46:10,000
And then we do one on each
emotional docks and we're like,
907
00:46:10,080 --> 00:46:12,320
it's probably our probably our
last.
908
00:46:12,320 --> 00:46:13,880
One, we just are glutton for
punishment.
909
00:46:14,160 --> 00:46:16,360
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
No, I think it was even, I
910
00:46:16,360 --> 00:46:19,440
think, no, I think it was even
worse 'cause we did the one on
911
00:46:20,000 --> 00:46:21,960
authority.
We said with our next ones,
912
00:46:21,960 --> 00:46:24,240
we're going to be the last one,
and then we did the one on the
913
00:46:24,240 --> 00:46:26,120
authority and we're like, yeah,
this is probably the last one.
914
00:46:26,360 --> 00:46:28,320
And then Eastern Orthodox,
probably the last one.
915
00:46:28,320 --> 00:46:31,440
And then Amish.
But we at, at the point in time
916
00:46:31,440 --> 00:46:33,640
we did the Amish, we knew we
were doing Jude too.
917
00:46:33,640 --> 00:46:37,000
So we didn't, we didn't, we
didn't say last last.
918
00:46:37,000 --> 00:46:40,760
But yeah, so I, I keep 'cause we
were so far ahead.
919
00:46:40,760 --> 00:46:43,680
I'm listening to them as they
come out and I'm like, Oh no,
920
00:46:43,680 --> 00:46:45,120
this is not going to be the last
one.
921
00:46:45,440 --> 00:46:47,840
Man, I love it.
Yeah, there we go.
922
00:46:47,840 --> 00:46:50,000
We should just just this should
just be a bit.
923
00:46:50,040 --> 00:46:52,800
It just like went indefinitely.
It's like the preacher is like
924
00:46:52,840 --> 00:46:57,160
I'm my final point, I'm wrapping
up, you know, and finally.
925
00:46:57,240 --> 00:46:59,360
The fake out.
Love it.
926
00:46:59,360 --> 00:47:01,160
Well, there you go, It's almost
midnight.
927
00:47:01,160 --> 00:47:03,640
It's not really almost midnight,
but it's close enough for me.
928
00:47:03,800 --> 00:47:08,120
Yeah, that's our thing.
Thanks for listening to Take
929
00:47:08,120 --> 00:47:10,320
Two.
Find us wherever you find
930
00:47:10,320 --> 00:47:12,840
podcasts and on YouTube for
those who want to watch our
931
00:47:12,840 --> 00:47:13,520
video cast.