Take 2 Theology

Season 2, Episode 134 In this episode, Michael and Zach begin a new series through Paul’s letter to the Galatians by examining its opening verses and the controversy that prompted the letter. After introducing Paul, the Galatian churches, the possible date of the letter, and its relationship to the Jerusalem Council, they turn to Galatians 1:1–10, where Paul wastes no time confronting a distorted gospel. The discussion explores Paul’s apostolic authority, the theological significance of his gre

Season 2, Episode 133 In this episode, Michael and Zach continue their series on conversational apologetics by exploring two more tools from Gregory Koukl’s Tactics: Sibling Rivalry and Taking the Roof Off. Both tactics help expose weaknesses in a worldview, but they do so in different ways. Sibling Rivalry highlights tensions between beliefs a person holds at the same time, while Taking the Roof Off follows an idea to its logical conclusion and asks whether that worldview can actually support

Season 2, Episode 132 In this episode, Michael and Zach sit down with Charles Smits to discuss his Lowcountry roots, Christian education, homeschooling, family, and unexpected journey into musical theatre. Charles reflects on growing up at Ferndale School, the strengths and challenges of different approaches to Christian education, and his wife Angela’s behind-the-scenes role as Head of Operations for House Theatre. The conversation also explores how Charles entered theatre through the involve

Season 2, Episode 131 In this episode, Michael and Zach continue their series on conversational apologetics by exploring Gregory Koukl’s Suicide Tactic—a way of recognizing claims that undermine or contradict themselves. Drawing from examples such as “There is no truth,” “You should never judge,” and “You shouldn’t force your morality on others,” they explain how some ideas collapse when consistently applied to themselves. The discussion also examines biblical examples of exposing faulty reason

Season 2, Episode 130 In this episode, Michael and Zach return to their series on cults and religious movements to respond to comments generated by their recent episodes on Roman Catholicism. Rather than mocking commenters or attempting to settle every Catholic-Protestant disagreement, they address several recurring objections concerning biblical authority, church history, the canon of Scripture, Martin Luther, justification by faith alone, good works, and James 2. Along the way, they clarify f

Season 2, Episode 129 In this episode, Michael and Zach continue their series on conversational apologetics by introducing the third question in Gregory Koukl’s Columbo Tactic: “Have you considered...?” While the first two Columbo questions help Christians understand what another person believes and why, the third gently introduces a new perspective and invites that person to evaluate the consistency of their own ideas. Drawing from examples such as Paul at Mars Hill, Paul before King Agrippa,